Exoskeletons: types, applications and certification challenges

The exoskeletons have established themselves as one of the most innovative technologies in the field of applied biomechanics, with remarkable growth both in clinical rehabilitation and in industrial and healthcare environments. These devices, designed to assist or increase human motor capacity, combine mechanical engineering, electronic control and in-depth knowledge of human movement.

However, their increasing adoption poses a key challenge: how to technically and clinically validate these complex systems and how to certify them according to current European regulations. In this article we analyze the main types of exoskeletons, their most relevant applications and the challenges associated with their certification as medical devices.

Types of exoskeletons according to design and functionality

Exoskeletons can be classified according to different technical and functional criteria, which directly influences testing and certification requirements.

Passive exoskeletons

They do not incorporate actuators or active control systems. They use mechanical elements such as springs, shock absorbers or elastic structures to redistribute loads and reduce the user’s physical effort. They are common in occupational risk prevention and postural assistance.

Active exoskeletons

They integrate motors, sensors and control algorithms that actively assist movement. They are mainly used in neurological rehabilitation, spinal cord injury and gait support. Their technical complexity requires much more extensive validation.

Hybrid exoskeletons

They combine passive and active elements, seeking a balance between mechanical simplicity and motorized assistance. Their use is growing in outpatient clinical applications.

Main applications of exoskeletons

The versatility of these devices has allowed their adoption in multiple sectors.

Clinical rehabilitation

In hospitals and rehabilitation centers, exoskeletons are used for:

  • gait re-education after stroke,
  • rehabilitation of spinal cord injuries,
  • treatment of neuromuscular pathologies,
  • improvement of mobility in geriatric patients.

In these cases, they are usually classified as medical devices under MDR 2017/745, which implies strict safety and clinical evidence requirements.

Functional assistance and personal mobility

Exoskeletons designed to facilitate activities of daily living for people with reduced mobility. Although they are not always used in clinical settings, they may fall within the medical regulatory framework depending on their purpose.

Industry and occupational ergonomics

In occupational risk prevention, exoskeletons reduce musculoskeletal loading in repetitive or load handling tasks. Their certification usually follows different regulatory frameworks, although the biomechanical principles of validation are similar.

exoesqueletos-certificaciones

Technical challenges in the validation of exoskeletons

Validation of an exoskeleton goes far beyond testing its structural strength.

Biomechanical complexity

The exoskeleton interacts directly with the human body. It is essential to evaluate:

  • load distribution in joints,
  • alignment with the anatomical axes,
  • adaptation to different anthropometries,
  • impact on the kinematics and dynamics of motion.

Control and safety systems

In active exoskeletons, the algorithms must respond safely to:

  • losses of equilibrium,
  • sensor failures,
  • power interruptions,
  • unexpected user movements.

Durability and reliability

These devices are subjected to thousands of cycles of use. Fatigue tests on structures, joints and actuators are critical to ensure their long-term reliability.

Regulatory and certification challenges

From a regulatory standpoint, exoskeletons present a particularly complex scenario.

Classification as a medical device

When the exoskeleton is intended for therapeutic purposes, the manufacturer must demonstrate compliance with MDR 2017/745, which implies:

  • risk management,
  • clinical evaluation,
  • post-marketing surveillance,
  • complete technical documentation.

Lack of specific harmonized standards

There is currently no single ISO standard specific to exoskeletons. Therefore, certification is based on:

  • general mechanical standards,
  • electrical safety standards,
  • customized biomechanical testing,
  • clinical evaluation guidelines.

This reinforces the need to work with laboratories specialized in applied biomechanics, capable of designing ad hoc test protocols.

IBV’s role in the validation of exoskeletons

The Biomechanics Institute of Valencia has advanced infrastructures for:

  • mechanical and fatigue tests,
  • analysis of human movement,
  • electromyography,
  • functional evaluation with real users,
  • technical support in regulatory processes.

This combination makes it possible to approach exoskeleton validation from a comprehensive perspective : technical, biomechanical and clinical, aligned with MDR requirements.

What is critical load in dental implants?

What is critical load in dental implants?

In dental implantology, one of the most relevant concepts from the biomechanical point of view is the critical load. This term refers to the load level at which an implant…

Differences between MDR and MDD for manufacturers

Differences between MDR and MDD for manufacturers

The move from Directive 93/42/EEC (MDD) to Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) has brought about one of the biggest regulatory changes in the history of the medical device sector in Europe.…

What tests must a dental implant pass before it reaches the market?

What tests must a dental implant pass before it reaches the market?

The development of a dental implantable medical device does not end when the design is finalized. Before reaching the market, a dental implant must pass a battery of mechanical, biological…

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.